📚StudySolv

Class 9 · Mathematics · GANITA MANJARI

Chapter 3 Important Questions: The World of Numbers

📄View PDFDownload
PDF · No login required
SolutionsNotesImportant Questions

1 Mark4 questions

Q1.mcq

Which of the following is an irrational number?

(A) √9

(B) √12

(C) 0.333...

(D) 22/7

(B) √12. √12 = 2√3, which cannot be expressed as p/q where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0. √9 = 3 (rational), 0.333... = 1/3 (rational), and 22/7 is already a fraction (rational).

Q2.short

According to Brahmagupta's rules, what is the result of (–7) × (–5)?

  1. According to Brahmagupta's rule, 'the product of two debts is a fortune', meaning a negative number multiplied by a negative number gives a positive number. Therefore, (–7) × (–5) = +35.
Q3.mcq

Which of the following rational numbers will have a terminating decimal expansion?

(A) 4/15

(B) 7/12

(C) 13/250

(D) 5/7

(C) 13/250. The denominator 250 = 2 × 5³. Since the prime factors of the denominator are only 2 and 5, the decimal expansion will terminate. The other denominators (15 = 3×5, 12 = 2²×3, 7) contain prime factors other than 2 and 5.

Q4.short

State whether the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is rational or irrational. Give one example to support your answer.

The sum of a rational number and an irrational number is always irrational. Example: 3 + √2 = 3 + 1.4142... = 4.4142..., which is non-terminating and non-repeating, hence irrational.

3 Marks7 questions

Q1.short

Convert the following repeating decimals into the form p/q:

(i) 0.6̄

(ii) 0.4̄5̄

(iii) 0.1̄6̄

(i) Let x = 0.666... → 10x = 6.666... → 10x – x = 6 → 9x = 6 → x = 6/9 = 2/3.

(ii) Let x = 0.454545... → 100x = 45.454545... → 100x – x = 45 → 99x = 45 → x = 45/99 = 5/11.

(iii) Let x = 0.1666... → 10x = 1.666... → 100x = 16.666... → 100x – 10x = 15 → 90x = 15 → x = 15/90 = 1/6.

Q2.short

The temperature in Ladakh is –4°C at midnight. By noon the next day, it rises by 19°C, and by the following midnight it drops by 23°C. Write this sequence as an equation using integers and find the final temperature.

Starting temperature = –4°C

Rise by 19°C: –4 + 19 = 15°C

Drop by 23°C: 15 – 23 = –8°C

Equation: (–4) + 19 + (–23) = –8°C

The final temperature is –8°C. This illustrates Brahmagupta's rules for integer arithmetic — combining fortunes (dhana) and debts (ṛiṇa).

Q3.short

Find three rational numbers strictly between 3/5 and 4/5. Also, explain the general method used to find a rational number between any two rational numbers.

Method: To find a rational number between a and b, compute their average = (a + b)/2.

Step 1: Average of 3/5 and 4/5 = (3/5 + 4/5)/2 = (7/5)/2 = 7/10.

Step 2: Average of 3/5 and 7/10 = (6/10 + 7/10)/2 = (13/10)/2 = 13/20.

Step 3: Average of 7/10 and 4/5 = (7/10 + 8/10)/2 = (15/10)/2 = 15/20 = 3/4.

Three rational numbers between 3/5 and 4/5 are: 13/20, 7/10, and 3/4.

General Method: The average (a+b)/2 of any two rational numbers a and b is always a rational number lying strictly between them. This process can be repeated infinitely, demonstrating the density of rational numbers.

Q4.short

A tailor has 15¾ metres of silk. Each kurta requires 2¼ metres. How many complete kurtas can he make? Express the calculation using rational numbers and also state how much silk is left over.

Total silk = 15¾ = 63/4 metres.

Silk required per kurta = 2¼ = 9/4 metres.

Number of kurtas = (63/4) ÷ (9/4) = (63/4) × (4/9) = 63/9 = 7.

The tailor can make exactly 7 complete kurtas.

Silk used = 7 × 9/4 = 63/4 = 15¾ metres.

Leftover silk = 63/4 – 63/4 = 0 metres.

Therefore, the tailor can make 7 kurtas with no silk remaining.

Q5.short

Classify each of the following numbers as rational or irrational. Justify each answer:

(i) √81

(ii) √5

(iii) 1.01001000100001...

(iv) 2.357̄ (i.e., 2.3575757...)

(i) √81 = 9 = 9/1. It can be expressed as p/q (p=9, q=1). Hence RATIONAL.

(ii) √5: Using proof by contradiction (similar to √2), if √5 = p/q in lowest terms, then 5q² = p², so 5 divides p. Let p = 5k, then q² = 5k², so 5 divides q — contradiction. Hence IRRATIONAL.

(iii) 1.01001000100001...: The pattern shows increasing zeros between 1s (1, 0, 1, 00, 1, 000, 1...). This is non-terminating and non-repeating (no fixed repeating block). Hence IRRATIONAL.

(iv) 2.3575757...: The digits '57' repeat after the non-repeating digit '3'. It is a non-terminating but repeating decimal. Hence RATIONAL. (It equals 2334/990 = 1167/495 simplified.)

Q6.short

Look at the column of notches on the Ishango bone: 11, 13, 17, 19.

(i) What mathematical property do these numbers share?

(ii) List the next three numbers that continue this pattern.

(iii) Are natural numbers closed under subtraction? Justify with examples.

(i) The numbers 11, 13, 17, and 19 are all prime numbers between 10 and 20. A prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself. This grouping on the Ishango bone (c. 20,000 BCE) suggests early humans recognised the concept of prime numbers.

(ii) The next three prime numbers after 19 are: 23, 29, and 31.

(Check: 20=4×5, 21=3×7, 22=2×11 — not prime; 23 is prime; 24,25,26,27,28 — not prime; 29 is prime; 30 — not prime; 31 is prime.)

(iii) Natural numbers are NOT closed under subtraction.

Closure means: for any two natural numbers a and b, a – b must also be a natural number.

Counter-examples:

• 3 – 5 = –2, and –2 is NOT a natural number.

• 7 – 7 = 0, and 0 is NOT a natural number (natural numbers start from 1).

Therefore, natural numbers are not closed under subtraction.

Q7.short

Simplify the following using Brahmagupta's laws of integer arithmetic:

(i) (–12) × 5

(ii) (–8) × (–7)

(iii) 0 – (–14)

(iv) (–20) ÷ 4

Also, explain rule (iii) using a real-world example involving debt.

(i) (–12) × 5: A debt multiplied by a fortune is a debt. (–12) × 5 = –60.

(ii) (–8) × (–7): The product of two debts is a fortune. (–8) × (–7) = +56.

(iii) 0 – (–14): Subtracting a negative number is the same as adding a positive number. 0 – (–14) = 0 + 14 = 14.

(iv) (–20) ÷ 4: A debt divided by a fortune remains a debt. (–20) ÷ 4 = –5.

Real-world explanation for (iii): Suppose someone owes you ₹14 (a debt of –14 to them means +14 to you). If that debt is cancelled or removed (subtracted), you gain ₹14. So removing a debt of ₹14 is the same as gaining ₹14: 0 – (–14) = +14.

5 Marks4 questions

Q1.long

Prove that √2 is an irrational number using the method of proof by contradiction. Clearly state each step of the proof.

Proof by Contradiction:

Step 1 – Assumption: Assume √2 is rational. Then it can be written as √2 = p/q, where p and q are integers, q ≠ 0, and p/q is in its lowest terms (i.e., p and q are co-prime, sharing no common factor other than 1).

Step 2 – Square both sides:

2 = p²/q²

Step 3 – Rearrange:

2q² = p²

Step 4 – Deduction about p: Since p² = 2q², p² is even (it equals 2 times an integer). If the square of an integer is even, the integer itself must be even. Therefore, p is even. Let p = 2k for some integer k.

Step 5 – Substitute p = 2k:

2q² = (2k)² = 4k²

Step 6 – Simplify:

q² = 2k²

Step 7 – Deduction about q: Since q² = 2k², q² is even. Therefore, q must also be even.

Step 8 – The Contradiction: We have shown that both p and q are even, meaning they share a common factor of 2. But this contradicts our assumption in Step 1 that p and q are co-prime (share no common factors other than 1).

Conclusion: Since our assumption leads to a logical contradiction, and each algebraic step was valid, the assumption itself must be false. Therefore, √2 cannot be expressed as a rational number. Hence, √2 is irrational. ∎

Q2.long

Convert the following into p/q form and also verify by performing long division:

(i) 2.357̄ (i.e., 2.3575757...)

(ii) 0.9̄ (i.e., 0.9999...)

For part (ii), explain what the result tells us about the representation of numbers.

(i) Converting 2.3575757...:

Let x = 2.3575757...

'35' is non-repeating (2 digits), '57' repeats (2 digits).

Multiply by 10² = 100: 100x = 235.7575...

Multiply by 10² = 100 again: 10000x = 23575.7575...

Subtract: 10000x – 100x = 23575.7575... – 235.7575...

9900x = 23340

x = 23340/9900 = 2334/990 = 1167/495

Verification: 1167 ÷ 495 = 2.35757... ✓

(ii) Converting 0.9999...:

Let x = 0.9999...

Multiply by 10: 10x = 9.9999...

Subtract: 10x – x = 9.9999... – 0.9999...

9x = 9

x = 9/9 = 1

Therefore 0.9̄ = 1 exactly.

Explanation: This remarkable result shows that decimal representations of numbers are not always unique. Every terminating decimal has an equivalent form ending in repeating 9s. For example, 1.000... = 0.999..., 2.47000... = 2.46999.... This is not a paradox but a property of our number system — two different decimal expressions can represent the exact same rational number. The density of real numbers ensures there is no 'gap' between 0.999... and 1.

Q3.long

Describe the step-by-step geometric construction to locate √2 on the number line. Then extend the method to locate √3 on the number line. Draw a neat labelled diagram for each case.

Construction of √2 on the number line:

Step 1: Draw a number line and mark the origin O. Mark point A at 1 unit to the right of O (OA = 1 unit).

Step 2: At point A, draw a perpendicular to the number line. On this perpendicular, mark point B such that AB = 1 unit.

Step 3: Join O to B. By the Baudhāyana–Pythagoras Theorem:

OB² = OA² + AB² = 1² + 1² = 2

Therefore OB = √2 units.

Step 4: With O as centre and OB as radius, draw an arc that intersects the number line at point P (to the right of O). Then OP = √2 units. P represents √2 on the number line.

Diagram: O----A (1 unit), perpendicular AB (1 unit) at A, hypotenuse OB = √2, arc from B to P on number line.

Construction of √3 on the number line:

Step 1: Using the point P located above where OP = √2, draw a perpendicular at P.

Step 2: Mark point Q on this perpendicular such that PQ = 1 unit.

Step 3: Join O to Q. By Pythagoras:

OQ² = OP² + PQ² = (√2)² + 1² = 2 + 1 = 3

Therefore OQ = √3 units.

Step 4: With O as centre and OQ as radius, draw an arc intersecting the number line at R. Then OR = √3 units. R represents √3.

General Method: To construct √n, first construct √(n–1) as a hypotenuse, then erect a unit perpendicular at its tip, and the new hypotenuse gives √n. This forms the square root spiral. This method can locate any √n for any positive integer n.

Q4.long

Answer the following:

(i) Explain why the decimal expansion of a rational number p/q (in lowest terms) is terminating if and only if the prime factors of q are only 2, 5, or both. Give two examples.

(ii) Without performing long division, determine whether 7/20 and 4/15 have terminating or non-terminating decimal expansions. Then convert 7/20 into its decimal form.

(iii) What does Mādhava's infinite series for π tell us about the nature of irrational numbers and their decimal expansions?

(i) A decimal terminates when the denominator of the fraction (in lowest terms) can be expressed as a power of 10. Since 10 = 2 × 5, any denominator of the form 2^m × 5^n can be converted to 10^k by multiplying numerator and denominator by the appropriate power of 2 or 5. This gives a fraction with denominator as a power of 10, which is a terminating decimal. If q has any prime factor other than 2 or 5 (like 3, 7, 11...), the denominator can never become a power of 10, so the division never terminates.

Examples:

• 3/8: 8 = 2³. Multiply by 5³: 3×125/(8×125) = 375/1000 = 0.375 ✓ (terminates)

• 5/11: 11 is prime (not 2 or 5). Division never terminates → 0.454545... = 0.4̄5̄

(ii) 7/20: 20 = 2² × 5. Prime factors are only 2 and 5. → TERMINATING.

Conversion: 7/20 = 7/(2²×5) = (7×5)/(2²×5²) = 35/100 = 0.35

4/15: 15 = 3 × 5. Prime factor 3 is present (not just 2 and 5). → NON-TERMINATING REPEATING.

(4/15 = 0.2666... = 0.2̄6̄)

(iii) Mādhava's infinite series π = 4(1 – 1/3 + 1/5 – 1/7 + ...) reveals a fundamental truth about irrational numbers: they cannot be expressed as any single fraction (finite ratio), but can be approached as closely as desired through an infinite process. Since π is irrational, its decimal expansion is non-terminating and non-repeating — it goes on forever without any repeating block. No finite sum of terms gives the exact value of π; only the infinite sum does. This illustrates why irrational numbers require infinite, non-repeating decimals for their exact representation, and why Āryabhaṭa (499 CE) correctly called his value 3927/1250 an 'asanna' (approximation), anticipating that π could not be captured by any single fraction.

Also available for GANITA MANJARI Chapter 3:

✅ Solutions·📝 Chapter Notes·📄 Download PDF
All chapters in GANITA MANJARI
Ch 1: Orienting Yourself: The Use of Coordinates
Ch 2: Introduction to Linear Polynomials
Ch 3: The World of Numbers← current
Ch 4: Exploring Algebraic Identities
Ch 5: I’m Up and Down, and Round and Round
Ch 6: Measuring Space: Perimeter and Area
Ch 7: The Mathematics of Maybe: Introduction to Probability
Ch 8: Predicting What Comes Next: Exploring Sequences and Progressions

Discussion

Ask a question or share your thoughts

Leave a comment about: GANITA MANJARI Chapter 3 Important Questions

Comments are reviewed before publishing

💬

No comments yet. Be the first!